Demarcation, instantiation, and individual traits: Realist social ontology for mental disorders




Koi Polaris

PublisherTaylor & Francis

2022

Philosophical Psychology

PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY

PHILOS PSYCHOL

35

6

793

813

21

0951-5089

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.2016674

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/68614658



Realists about mental disorder have been hasty about dismissing social explanations of how mental disorder is constituted. However, many social ontologies are realist ontologies. In order to create a meaningful distinction between realism and social metaphysics about mental disorder, I propose that realism about mental disorder is best understood as Individual Trait Realism (ITR) about them. For ITR, mental disorders exist in virtue of traits. I defend the view that ITR is compatible with social metaphysics, arguing that, in asking whether constituents in the social sphere figure the metaphysics of psychopathology, we are asking questions on three different strata of explanation: the strata of demarcation, instantiation, and individual traits. Distinguishing between these strata allows for nuanced realism that need not reject the social constitution of mental disorder.

Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:05