A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients




TekijätLepomäki Maiju, Karhunen-Enckell Ulla, Tuominen Jalmari, Kronqvist Pauliina, Oksala Niku, Murtola Teemu, Roine Antti

KustantajaWILEY

Julkaisuvuosi2022

JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY

Lehden akronyymiJ SURG ONCOL

Vuosikerta125

Numero4

Aloitussivu577

Lopetussivu588

Sivujen määrä12

ISSN0022-4790

eISSN1096-9098

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26749

Verkko-osoitehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.26749

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/68298411


Tiivistelmä

Background and Objectives

Optimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age.

Methods

A retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin.

Results

The incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50-64), 68% (65-79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (<= 1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1-2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Individual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:25