A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients




AuthorsLepomäki Maiju, Karhunen-Enckell Ulla, Tuominen Jalmari, Kronqvist Pauliina, Oksala Niku, Murtola Teemu, Roine Antti

PublisherWILEY

Publication year2022

JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology

Journal name in sourceJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY

Journal acronymJ SURG ONCOL

Volume125

Issue4

First page 577

Last page588

Number of pages12

ISSN0022-4790

eISSN1096-9098

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26749

Web address https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.26749

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/68298411


Abstract

Background and Objectives

Optimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age.

Methods

A retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin.

Results

The incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50-64), 68% (65-79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (<= 1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1-2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Individual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:25