A Curious Decision by Zambia’s Highest Court: Six Years Imprisonment for Civil Contempt?




Phiri Christopher

PublisherBrill

2019

African Journal of Legal Studies

African Journal of Legal Studies

12

2

1708-7384

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340046

http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340046



Abstract
On 23 November 2018, the Supreme Court of Zambia delivered a judgement which suggests that Zambian judges have virtually unbridled power to move on their own motion to punish for contempt of court anyone who criticises their judicial decisions. This article considers that judgement. It argues that whilst justice might well have been done in the case in question, it was certainly not seen to be done. Two main reasons are given for this argument. First, the judges appeared to have acted both as prosecutors and adjudicators in their own cause when it was neither urgent nor imperative to act immediately on their own motion. Second, the classification by the Court of the contempt in question as civil contempt rather than criminal contempt is alien to the common law world. The article culminates in a clarion call for the Zambian legislature to intervene and clarify the law of contempt of court to avert capricious and unbridled invocation of the judicial power to punish for contempt.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 19:29