A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
A Curious Decision by Zambia’s Highest Court: Six Years Imprisonment for Civil Contempt?
Tekijät: Phiri Christopher
Kustantaja: Brill
Julkaisuvuosi: 2019
Journal: African Journal of Legal Studies
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: African Journal of Legal Studies
Vuosikerta: 12
Numero: 2
ISSN: 1708-7384
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340046
Verkko-osoite: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340046
Tiivistelmä
Abstract
On 23 November 2018, the Supreme Court of Zambia delivered a judgement which suggests that Zambian judges have virtually unbridled power to move on their own motion to punish for contempt of court anyone who criticises their judicial decisions. This article considers that judgement. It argues that whilst justice might well have been done in the case in question, it was certainly not seen to be done. Two main reasons are given for this argument. First, the judges appeared to have acted both as prosecutors and adjudicators in their own cause when it was neither urgent nor imperative to act immediately on their own motion. Second, the classification by the Court of the contempt in question as civil contempt rather than criminal contempt is alien to the common law world. The article culminates in a clarion call for the Zambian legislature to intervene and clarify the law of contempt of court to avert capricious and unbridled invocation of the judicial power to punish for contempt.
Abstract
On 23 November 2018, the Supreme Court of Zambia delivered a judgement which suggests that Zambian judges have virtually unbridled power to move on their own motion to punish for contempt of court anyone who criticises their judicial decisions. This article considers that judgement. It argues that whilst justice might well have been done in the case in question, it was certainly not seen to be done. Two main reasons are given for this argument. First, the judges appeared to have acted both as prosecutors and adjudicators in their own cause when it was neither urgent nor imperative to act immediately on their own motion. Second, the classification by the Court of the contempt in question as civil contempt rather than criminal contempt is alien to the common law world. The article culminates in a clarion call for the Zambian legislature to intervene and clarify the law of contempt of court to avert capricious and unbridled invocation of the judicial power to punish for contempt.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali