Burden of allergic rhinitis and impact of MP-AzeFlu from the patient perspective: pan European patient survey




Canonica G Walter, Klimek Ludger, Acaster Sarah, Dollner Ralph, Kaulsay Ranbir, Lo Siu Hing, Price David B, Scadding Glenis K, Valovirta Erkka, Zieglmayer Petra

PublisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

2021

 Current Medical Research and Opinion

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION

CURR MED RES OPIN

37

7

1259

1272

14

0300-7995

1473-4877

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2021.1911973

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2021.1911973

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/56055729



Objective

The aims of this survey were to (1) assess the burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) from the patient perspective, (2) investigate MP-AzeFlu use in real life and its impact on patients' lives and (3) explore factors associated with treatment satisfaction.

Methods

A cross-sectional, quantitative, online, questionnaire-based survey was conducted in seven European countries (March-June 2019). Questions explored AR burden and treatment satisfaction. Satisfaction was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication 9-item (TSQM-9; max score = 100). Participants (aged >= 18 years) had a doctor/healthcare provider confirmed AR diagnosis and used MP-AzeFlu within the last year.

Results

Pre-MP-AzeFlu treatment, participants (n = 1004) reported an average of 3.3 (SD:3.5) doctor visits/year, 8.1 (SD:11.0) days/year absenteeism and 15.8 (SD:18.9) days/year presenteeism due to AR. Only 48% of participants used MP-AzeFlu twice/day as recommended. Post-MP-AzeFlu 57% of participants reported better QoL, 47% reported fewer doctor visits and 52% discontinued polypharmacy. Absenteeism and presenteeism were reduced by 2.5 (SD 10.0) and 7.3 (SD:16.0) days/year, respectively. 70% of participants were more/much more satisfied with MP-AzeFlu versus previous AR treatment(s), and >= 70% were satisfied/extremely satisfied with its ability to prevent/treat AR, relieve symptoms and with its onset of action. Mean global, effectiveness and convenience TSQM-9 scores were 70.0 (SD:19.8), 68.3 (SD:21.6) and 72.7 (SD:20.4), respectively. Treatment satisfaction and effectiveness were significantly improved when MP-AzeFlu was taken as recommended.

Conclusions

The impact of AR on patients' lives remains high. Real-life use of MP-AzeFlu reduces that impact and is associated with a high level of effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction.


Last updated on 26/11/2024 12:24:01 PM