A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Comparative Clinical Trajectories Across Cannabis‐Related and Nonsubstance‐Related Psychoses
Tekijät: Mustonen, Antti; Niemelä, Solja; Denissoff, Alexander; Tanskanen, Antti; Mittendorfer‐Rutz, Ellenor; Lähteenvuo, Markku; Tiihonen, Jari; Taipale, Heidi
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Artikkelin numero: acps.70097
ISSN: 0001-690X
eISSN: 1600-0447
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70097
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70097
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522972024
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
Background
Research indicates that first-episode psychosis (FEP) with cannabis use disorder (CUD) carries a substantial disease burden, but more granular clinical trajectories of cannabis-related psychoses remain unclear. This study examines the clinical trajectories of first clinically diagnosed FEP&CUD and cannabis-induced psychosis (CIP) in comparison with FEP without substance use disorder (SUD).
MethodsFrom the linkage of nationwide administrative and medical registers of Sweden (2006–2021), we identified 1772 individuals (84.1% men) with incident CIP, 1360 individuals (84.3% men) with FEP&CUD and matched individuals with FEP but without SUD and followed them up until 2023. We compared annual prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses before and after cohort entry, medication use, days in inpatient care, and the risks of hospitalization for psychosis and death.
ResultsMean age at first diagnosis was 26.6 years (SD 8.3) for incident CIP and 26.9 years (SD 8.4) for FEP&CUD and FEP without SUD. Individuals in the FEP without SUD cohort were more likely to have a record of schizophrenia diagnosis compared to the FEP&CUD and CIP cohorts during the first (14.41%, 6.25%, 2.37%) and second year (10.88%, 7.13%, 3.27%) after cohort entry. However, FEP&CUD and CIP cohorts had a more pronounced burden of inpatient treatment as well as elevated risks of hospitalization for psychosis (aHR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.49–1.86 and aHR = 1.47; 1.32–1.64) and death (aHR = 2.02; 1.44–2.82 and aHR = 1.80; 1.30–2.50) compared to individuals with FEP without SUD.
ConclusionsCannabis-related psychoses, that is, FEP&CUD and CIP, were associated with poor outcomes, including high risk of hospitalization for psychosis and increased mortality, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. Moreover, the overlapping clinical trajectories suggest that cannabis-related psychoses may not represent clinically distinct entities but instead lie on a continuum.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council (2024-03340), Juho Vainio Foundation, State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, and the Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies. We utilized data from the REWHARD consortium supported by the Swedish Research Council (grant number 2021-00154). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.