A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Comparative Clinical Trajectories Across Cannabis‐Related and Nonsubstance‐Related Psychoses




AuthorsMustonen, Antti; Niemelä, Solja; Denissoff, Alexander; Tanskanen, Antti; Mittendorfer‐Rutz, Ellenor; Lähteenvuo, Markku; Tiihonen, Jari; Taipale, Heidi

Publication year2026

Journal: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Article numberacps.70097

ISSN0001-690X

eISSN1600-0447

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70097

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70097

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/522972024

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
Background

Research indicates that first-episode psychosis (FEP) with cannabis use disorder (CUD) carries a substantial disease burden, but more granular clinical trajectories of cannabis-related psychoses remain unclear. This study examines the clinical trajectories of first clinically diagnosed FEP&CUD and cannabis-induced psychosis (CIP) in comparison with FEP without substance use disorder (SUD).

Methods

From the linkage of nationwide administrative and medical registers of Sweden (2006–2021), we identified 1772 individuals (84.1% men) with incident CIP, 1360 individuals (84.3% men) with FEP&CUD and matched individuals with FEP but without SUD and followed them up until 2023. We compared annual prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses before and after cohort entry, medication use, days in inpatient care, and the risks of hospitalization for psychosis and death.

Results

Mean age at first diagnosis was 26.6 years (SD 8.3) for incident CIP and 26.9 years (SD 8.4) for FEP&CUD and FEP without SUD. Individuals in the FEP without SUD cohort were more likely to have a record of schizophrenia diagnosis compared to the FEP&CUD and CIP cohorts during the first (14.41%, 6.25%, 2.37%) and second year (10.88%, 7.13%, 3.27%) after cohort entry. However, FEP&CUD and CIP cohorts had a more pronounced burden of inpatient treatment as well as elevated risks of hospitalization for psychosis (aHR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.49–1.86 and aHR = 1.47; 1.32–1.64) and death (aHR = 2.02; 1.44–2.82 and aHR = 1.80; 1.30–2.50) compared to individuals with FEP without SUD.

Conclusions

Cannabis-related psychoses, that is, FEP&CUD and CIP, were associated with poor outcomes, including high risk of hospitalization for psychosis and increased mortality, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. Moreover, the overlapping clinical trajectories suggest that cannabis-related psychoses may not represent clinically distinct entities but instead lie on a continuum.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council (2024-03340), Juho Vainio Foundation, State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, and the Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies. We utilized data from the REWHARD consortium supported by the Swedish Research Council (grant number 2021-00154). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.


Last updated on 23/04/2026 08:44:03 AM