A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Factors associated with resection volume and reoperation rates in breast-conserving surgery




TekijätKarhunen-Enckell, Ulla; Salminen, Annukka; Tolonen, Teemu; Joukainen, Sarianna; Aaltonen, Riitta; Norja, Heikki; Repo, Heli; Korpinen, Katarina; Metsola, Hanna; Lesonen, Timo; Kronqvist, Pauliina; Luukkaala, Tiina; Lepomäki, Maiju; Oksala, Niku; Roine, Antti

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: EJSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Artikkelin numero111735

Vuosikerta52

Numero5

ISSN0748-7983

eISSN1532-2157

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111735

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111735

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/516330947

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä
Background

Achieving tumor-free margins without unintentional tissue loss is essential in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Calculated resection ratio (CRR) and tumor eccentricity measuring tumor displacement from the specimen center have been proposed as complementary quality metrics to reoperation and mastectomy rates. The objective of this study was to identify factors influencing CRRs and reoperations in BCS.

Methods

The prospective, multi-center FIBRATIO study included 206 women undergoing unilateral BCS for invasive cancer and/or ductal carcinoma in situ across five Finnish centers. Tumor, specimen, and breast volumes were measured radiologically and histopathologically. CRRs, defined as total resection volume (TRV) divided by optimal resection volume, were calculated both radiologically (CRRrad) and histologically (CRRpat). Eccentricity and relative eccentricity (adjusted for tumor size) were also assessed. Associations with clinical and imaging variables, and reoperations were analyzed using multivariable analyses.

Results

Median CRRrad was 2.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5–3.7] and CRRpat 2.4 (IQR 1.4–3.7). Relative eccentricity was 1.0 (IQR 0.5–2.0), higher in smaller tumors and correlated with CRRs. Reoperation occurred in 14% of patients and was associated with larger lesion size and lower CRRs. High CRRs were associated with large breast volume, non-dense breasts, and non-palpable tumors. CRRs decreased with increasing tumor size. Tumor spiculation was associated with higher CRRrad. Statistically significant inter-surgeon and inter-center variability in CRRs and reoperation rates was observed.

Conclusions

BCS is associated with variable and often excessive resection of healthy tissue. Identifying patients at risk for over-resection may improve surgical planning. Incorporating CRR into quality metrics alongside reoperation and mastectomy rates could enhance benchmarking.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Ulla Karhunen-Enckell declares funding from Pirkanmaa Cancer Society, Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Ida Montin Foundation, Vappu Uuspää Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation/Gust. Rud. Idman Fund, and Cancer Foundation Finland (WOIHTI Fund). This study was also financially supported partly by the State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa (Project No 9AC027, T62814, and 63834) and Tampere University Hospital Support Foundation, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa (Project No MK 360 and 69744).


Last updated on