A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Factors associated with resection volume and reoperation rates in breast-conserving surgery
Authors: Karhunen-Enckell, Ulla; Salminen, Annukka; Tolonen, Teemu; Joukainen, Sarianna; Aaltonen, Riitta; Norja, Heikki; Repo, Heli; Korpinen, Katarina; Metsola, Hanna; Lesonen, Timo; Kronqvist, Pauliina; Luukkaala, Tiina; Lepomäki, Maiju; Oksala, Niku; Roine, Antti
Publication year: 2026
Journal: EJSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Article number: 111735
Volume: 52
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0748-7983
eISSN: 1532-2157
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111735
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Partially Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111735
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/516330947
Self-archived copy's licence: CC BY
Self-archived copy's version: Publisher`s PDF
Background
Achieving tumor-free margins without unintentional tissue loss is essential in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Calculated resection ratio (CRR) and tumor eccentricity measuring tumor displacement from the specimen center have been proposed as complementary quality metrics to reoperation and mastectomy rates. The objective of this study was to identify factors influencing CRRs and reoperations in BCS.
MethodsThe prospective, multi-center FIBRATIO study included 206 women undergoing unilateral BCS for invasive cancer and/or ductal carcinoma in situ across five Finnish centers. Tumor, specimen, and breast volumes were measured radiologically and histopathologically. CRRs, defined as total resection volume (TRV) divided by optimal resection volume, were calculated both radiologically (CRRrad) and histologically (CRRpat). Eccentricity and relative eccentricity (adjusted for tumor size) were also assessed. Associations with clinical and imaging variables, and reoperations were analyzed using multivariable analyses.
ResultsMedian CRRrad was 2.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5–3.7] and CRRpat 2.4 (IQR 1.4–3.7). Relative eccentricity was 1.0 (IQR 0.5–2.0), higher in smaller tumors and correlated with CRRs. Reoperation occurred in 14% of patients and was associated with larger lesion size and lower CRRs. High CRRs were associated with large breast volume, non-dense breasts, and non-palpable tumors. CRRs decreased with increasing tumor size. Tumor spiculation was associated with higher CRRrad. Statistically significant inter-surgeon and inter-center variability in CRRs and reoperation rates was observed.
ConclusionsBCS is associated with variable and often excessive resection of healthy tissue. Identifying patients at risk for over-resection may improve surgical planning. Incorporating CRR into quality metrics alongside reoperation and mastectomy rates could enhance benchmarking.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
Ulla Karhunen-Enckell declares funding from Pirkanmaa Cancer Society, Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Ida Montin Foundation, Vappu Uuspää Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation/Gust. Rud. Idman Fund, and Cancer Foundation Finland (WOIHTI Fund). This study was also financially supported partly by the State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa (Project No 9AC027, T62814, and 63834) and Tampere University Hospital Support Foundation, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa (Project No MK 360 and 69744).