A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Factors associated with resection volume and reoperation rates in breast-conserving surgery




AuthorsKarhunen-Enckell, Ulla; Salminen, Annukka; Tolonen, Teemu; Joukainen, Sarianna; Aaltonen, Riitta; Norja, Heikki; Repo, Heli; Korpinen, Katarina; Metsola, Hanna; Lesonen, Timo; Kronqvist, Pauliina; Luukkaala, Tiina; Lepomäki, Maiju; Oksala, Niku; Roine, Antti

Publication year2026

Journal: EJSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Article number111735

Volume52

Issue5

ISSN0748-7983

eISSN1532-2157

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111735

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111735

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/516330947

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
Background

Achieving tumor-free margins without unintentional tissue loss is essential in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Calculated resection ratio (CRR) and tumor eccentricity measuring tumor displacement from the specimen center have been proposed as complementary quality metrics to reoperation and mastectomy rates. The objective of this study was to identify factors influencing CRRs and reoperations in BCS.

Methods

The prospective, multi-center FIBRATIO study included 206 women undergoing unilateral BCS for invasive cancer and/or ductal carcinoma in situ across five Finnish centers. Tumor, specimen, and breast volumes were measured radiologically and histopathologically. CRRs, defined as total resection volume (TRV) divided by optimal resection volume, were calculated both radiologically (CRRrad) and histologically (CRRpat). Eccentricity and relative eccentricity (adjusted for tumor size) were also assessed. Associations with clinical and imaging variables, and reoperations were analyzed using multivariable analyses.

Results

Median CRRrad was 2.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5–3.7] and CRRpat 2.4 (IQR 1.4–3.7). Relative eccentricity was 1.0 (IQR 0.5–2.0), higher in smaller tumors and correlated with CRRs. Reoperation occurred in 14% of patients and was associated with larger lesion size and lower CRRs. High CRRs were associated with large breast volume, non-dense breasts, and non-palpable tumors. CRRs decreased with increasing tumor size. Tumor spiculation was associated with higher CRRrad. Statistically significant inter-surgeon and inter-center variability in CRRs and reoperation rates was observed.

Conclusions

BCS is associated with variable and often excessive resection of healthy tissue. Identifying patients at risk for over-resection may improve surgical planning. Incorporating CRR into quality metrics alongside reoperation and mastectomy rates could enhance benchmarking.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Ulla Karhunen-Enckell declares funding from Pirkanmaa Cancer Society, Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Ida Montin Foundation, Vappu Uuspää Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation/Gust. Rud. Idman Fund, and Cancer Foundation Finland (WOIHTI Fund). This study was also financially supported partly by the State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa (Project No 9AC027, T62814, and 63834) and Tampere University Hospital Support Foundation, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa (Project No MK 360 and 69744).


Last updated on 14/04/2026 09:02:44 AM