A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
National policy responses to address loneliness: A global scoping review of 194 WHO member states
Tekijät: Goldman, Nina; Alemdar, Melek; Megges, Herlind; Matsumoto, Naka; Schoenmakers, Eric; van den Berg, Pauline; Lasgaard, Mathias; Christiansen, Julie; Junttila, Niina; Goldman, Andreas; Draxl, Debora; El-Osta, Austen; Qualter, Pamela
Kustantaja: Elsevier
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Health Policy
Artikkelin numero: 105553
Vuosikerta: 165
ISSN: 0168-8510
eISSN: 1872-6054
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105553
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105553
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508473436
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
Background
Loneliness is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. It affects individuals across all age groups and geographical regions.
ObjectiveTo characterise the extent that WHO Member States address loneliness, social isolation and social connection through national policies.
MethodsWe searched government websites using key terms. A matrix was used to extract data, followed by in-depth document analysis.
ResultsBy February 2025, only eight WHO Member States (Denmark, UK (England, Scotland, Wales), Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Japan, USA) had policies directly addressing loneliness, social isolation or social connection. Policymakers validated the findings. Common policy aims included building a more connected society, addressing loneliness as a wider societal challenge rather than just an individual issue, and supporting both individuals and organisations to manage loneliness. Key recommendations in these policies often highlighted the need to increase knowledge through research, raise public awareness to reduce stigma, promote cross-sectoral collaboration, integrate loneliness into government policy and implement community-based approaches. National policies emerged following societal activism, initiatives from government departments or a large-scale research project.
ConclusionVarious policies are in place to help address loneliness at the national level. To maximise impact, policies require adequate funding. To date, none of the national policies had undergone rigorous evaluation concerning their effectiveness. This review highlights the growing political focus on loneliness and provides a starting point for those seeking to understand, develop or strengthen national strategies to address loneliness, social isolation or social connection.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This research was commissioned and partly funded by the World Health Organization (WHO). Nina Goldman was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), Bern (Grant #: 214225). Austen El-Osta is grateful for support from the National Institute for Health Research and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the WHO, SNSF, NHS or the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.