A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

National policy responses to address loneliness: A global scoping review of 194 WHO member states




AuthorsGoldman, Nina; Alemdar, Melek; Megges, Herlind; Matsumoto, Naka; Schoenmakers, Eric; van den Berg, Pauline; Lasgaard, Mathias; Christiansen, Julie; Junttila, Niina; Goldman, Andreas; Draxl, Debora; El-Osta, Austen; Qualter, Pamela

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2026

Journal: Health Policy

Article number105553

Volume165

ISSN0168-8510

eISSN1872-6054

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105553

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105553

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508473436

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
Background

Loneliness is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. It affects individuals across all age groups and geographical regions.

Objective

To characterise the extent that WHO Member States address loneliness, social isolation and social connection through national policies.

Methods

We searched government websites using key terms. A matrix was used to extract data, followed by in-depth document analysis.

Results

By February 2025, only eight WHO Member States (Denmark, UK (England, Scotland, Wales), Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Japan, USA) had policies directly addressing loneliness, social isolation or social connection. Policymakers validated the findings. Common policy aims included building a more connected society, addressing loneliness as a wider societal challenge rather than just an individual issue, and supporting both individuals and organisations to manage loneliness. Key recommendations in these policies often highlighted the need to increase knowledge through research, raise public awareness to reduce stigma, promote cross-sectoral collaboration, integrate loneliness into government policy and implement community-based approaches. National policies emerged following societal activism, initiatives from government departments or a large-scale research project.

Conclusion

Various policies are in place to help address loneliness at the national level. To maximise impact, policies require adequate funding. To date, none of the national policies had undergone rigorous evaluation concerning their effectiveness. This review highlights the growing political focus on loneliness and provides a starting point for those seeking to understand, develop or strengthen national strategies to address loneliness, social isolation or social connection.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This research was commissioned and partly funded by the World Health Organization (WHO). Nina Goldman was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), Bern (Grant #: 214225). Austen El-Osta is grateful for support from the National Institute for Health Research and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the WHO, SNSF, NHS or the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.


Last updated on 23/01/2026 03:04:14 PM