A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Measuring Self-Control Beliefs: A Multidimensional and Domain-Specific Perspective




AuthorsBwalya, Anssi; Koi, Polaris; Rabagliati, Hugh; Chevalier, Nicolas

PublisherSAGE Publications

Publication year2026

Journal: Psychological Reports

Article number00332941251415321

ISSN0033-2941

eISSN1558-691X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251415321

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251415321

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508306784

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY NC

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Self-control allows people to align their behaviour with intention in the face of a motivational conflict. Lay beliefs about self-control are associated with self-control performance. However, previous research has focused on whether self-control is seen as a limited resource in the short term and mostly ignored beliefs about whether self-control is malleable in the long term. We examined these two aspects of lay beliefs in two preregistered questionnaire studies with adult UK participants (n1 = 182, n2 = 199). In both studies, beliefs about the limitedness and malleability of self-control were relatively independent of each other. Moreover, limitedness beliefs varied depending on the self-control domain. Self-control beliefs were related to but relatively distinct from self-esteem, self-efficacy, and trait self-control. Beliefs about the malleability of self-control were moderately associated with beliefs about the malleability of overall personality, but not with beliefs about intelligence. Our results support a multidimensional and domain-specific approach when measuring self-control beliefs.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences (PPLS), the University of Edinburgh (College Research Award).


Last updated on 28/01/2026 10:17:52 AM