A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Sensitivity Reading or Kokemuslukeminen as an Ethical-Aesthetic Intervention in Finnish Youth Literature




TekijätLeiwo, Ennaliina

KustantajaFincham Press

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: The International Journal of Young Adult Literature

Vuosikerta6

Numero1

Aloitussivu1

Lopetussivu22

eISSN2634-5277

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24877/IJYAL.196

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.24877/ijyal.196

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508082340

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

Sensitivity reading is a specialized editorial practice focused on better representation of historically marginalized groups in literature. While the practice originates from 2010s children’s and young adult literature publishing in the United States, it has since also been employed elsewhere around the world. This article focuses on kokemuslukeminen (“lived experience reading”) – sensitivity reading in the context of Finnish youth literature – as a localized version of a more international practice. Drawing on interviews with three sensitivity readers in Finland, it aims to provide new insight into the practice by broadening the understanding of it beyond the dominant Anglo-American perspective through an analysis of sensitivity readers’ accounts in this specific context and in dialogue with relevant feminist discussions. Situating the practice locally, for example in relation to questions of genre and institutional realities, while also acknowledging its roots in long-standing theoretical and political traditions, provides valuable insight into the practice as well as important tools for both its defense and the critique. Indeed, in order to seriously engage with sensitivity reading as a practice, we must acknowledge not only its possibilities but also its ideological and institutional limitations.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on