A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Sensitivity Reading or Kokemuslukeminen as an Ethical-Aesthetic Intervention in Finnish Youth Literature




AuthorsLeiwo, Ennaliina

PublisherFincham Press

Publication year2025

Journal: The International Journal of Young Adult Literature

Volume6

Issue1

First page 1

Last page22

eISSN2634-5277

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24877/IJYAL.196

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.24877/ijyal.196

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/508082340

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Sensitivity reading is a specialized editorial practice focused on better representation of historically marginalized groups in literature. While the practice originates from 2010s children’s and young adult literature publishing in the United States, it has since also been employed elsewhere around the world. This article focuses on kokemuslukeminen (“lived experience reading”) – sensitivity reading in the context of Finnish youth literature – as a localized version of a more international practice. Drawing on interviews with three sensitivity readers in Finland, it aims to provide new insight into the practice by broadening the understanding of it beyond the dominant Anglo-American perspective through an analysis of sensitivity readers’ accounts in this specific context and in dialogue with relevant feminist discussions. Situating the practice locally, for example in relation to questions of genre and institutional realities, while also acknowledging its roots in long-standing theoretical and political traditions, provides valuable insight into the practice as well as important tools for both its defense and the critique. Indeed, in order to seriously engage with sensitivity reading as a practice, we must acknowledge not only its possibilities but also its ideological and institutional limitations.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 15/01/2026 01:40:38 PM