A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Revisiting Tools for Change: Reflections on Methodologies and Desire-based Approaches in Roma-related Research
Authors: Lindroos, Sanni
Publisher: Central European University
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Critical Romani Studies
Volume: 8
Issue: 1
First page : 222
Last page: 233
ISSN: 2560-3019
eISSN: 2630-855X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.232
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.232
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/506457091
Self-archived copy's version: Publisher`s PDF
In this article, I revisit some of the main critiques, questions and suggestions in relation to methodological approaches emergingalongside the discipline of Critical Romani Studies. Drawing from Indigenous Studies scholar Eve Tuck’s notion of desire-basedresearch, I apply the three goals that Tuck set to foster emancipatory methodologies as a framework to reflect on the strengths andlimitations of previously proposed methodologies in Romanirelated research. By establishing counterhistories of Roma, Romanischolarship, a reconfiguration of the archive, and reflections on critical whiteness as the main topics in the epistemological paradigmshift unfolding over the past decade, I suggest some further points for methodological consideration that could advance the discipline.In particular, I discuss the possibility of co-researching as a mode of participatory knowledge production and propose digital platforms as a potential site of research, as well as call for further reflections on how to make research results more accessible to wider audiences.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |