A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Revisiting Tools for Change: Reflections on Methodologies and Desire-based Approaches in Roma-related Research




TekijätLindroos, Sanni

KustantajaCentral European University

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: Critical Romani Studies

Vuosikerta8

Numero1

Aloitussivu222

Lopetussivu233

ISSN2560-3019

eISSN2630-855X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.232

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.232

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/506457091

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

In this article, I revisit some of the main critiques, questions and suggestions in relation to methodological approaches emergingalongside the discipline of Critical Romani Studies. Drawing from Indigenous Studies scholar Eve Tuck’s notion of desire-basedresearch, I apply the three goals that Tuck set to foster emancipatory methodologies as a framework to reflect on the strengths andlimitations of previously proposed methodologies in Romanirelated research. By establishing counterhistories of Roma, Romanischolarship, a reconfiguration of the archive, and reflections on critical whiteness as the main topics in the epistemological paradigmshift unfolding over the past decade, I suggest some further points for methodological consideration that could advance the discipline.In particular, I discuss the possibility of co-researching as a mode of participatory knowledge production and propose digital platforms as a potential site of research, as well as call for further reflections on how to make research results more accessible to wider audiences.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on