D3 Article in a professional conference publication
Robust Modelling of Ordinal Survey Data Using Probabilistic Programming
Authors: Lahtinen, Aleksi; Edwards, James Rhys; Calmbach, Marc; Tautscher, Isabella; Lahti, Leo
Editors: Arnold, Taylor; Fantoli, Margherita; Ros, Ruben
Conference name: Computational Humanities Research
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Anthology of Computers and the Humanities
Book title : Computational Humanities Research 2025 : The proceedings of the Computational Humanities Research conference, held at the Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH) at the University of Luxembourg (December 9-12, 2025)
Volume: 3
First page : 608
Last page: 625
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63744/eCwMjQ976nWf
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.63744/eCwMjQ976nWf
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/505865620
Surveys play a central role in much of the research conducted in the humanities and social sciences. A common data type encountered in surveys is the ordinal variable, which differs from nominal categorical variables. Several regression methods are available for analysing ordinal data, with the cumulative logistic model being one of the most widely used. However, ordinal survey data often present challenges, particularly in studies with small sample sizes, where some response categories and levels of explanatory variables can have low response rates. In such cases, classical statistical methods can produce unreliable or incomplete estimates. Here, we investigate the use of probabilistic programming, grounded in Bayesian analysis, as a more robust alternative for estimating category probabilities of ordinal variables and other model parameters. These models are better equipped to handle uncertainty and provide more reliable estimates, even in the presence of sparse data. We validate the approach with simulated data where the ground truth is known, and demonstrate the advantages of this approach by comparing it to its classical frequentist counterpart in the context of cultural participation and access survey.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
This work received funding from the European Union funded under Grant No. 101095295 (OpenMusE) and Strategic Council of Finland Grant No. 352604 (Out of Despair).