A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Testing of additively manufactured aluminium material and cross-sections in compression




TekijätZhang, Ruizhi; Amraei, Mohsen; Piili, Heidi; Gardner, Leroy

KustantajaElsevier BV

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalEngineering Structures

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiEngineering Structures

Artikkelin numero120798

Vuosikerta341

ISSN0141-0296

eISSN1873-7323

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120798

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120798

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499583923


Tiivistelmä

A comprehensive experimental investigation into the mechanical properties and structural performance of square hollow section (SHS) stub columns manufactured by laser beam powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) from AlSi10Mg aluminium alloy, has been conducted and is presented herein. A series of tensile and compressive coupons with different build directions, together with six SHS stub columns, were additively manufactured and tested. The PBF-LB/M AlSi10Mg material exhibited good mechanical performance and mild anisotropy, with yield and ultimate strengths of around 280 MPa and 420 MPa, respectively, and fracture strains of between about 4 % and 7 %. SHS profiles were examined to isolate the influence of the manufacturing process, enabling direct comparisons with the performance and design of conventionally produced cross-sections. The PBF-LB/M aluminium SHS stub columns failed by inelastic local buckling and exhibited similar performance to conventionally manufactured aluminium SHS in the slender range, while showing higher normalised load-carrying capacities in the stocky range. Comparisons with the existing design methods indicated that both Eurocode 9 (EC9) and the continuous strength method (CSM) can provide safe-sided resistance predictions, with the CSM yielding more accurate and consistent results.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-01-09 at 14:27