From Simple Sandbox Process to Regulatory Sandbox Framework : Serving the Dual Objectives of AI Regulation




Heikkilä, Jukka; Lagstedt, Altti; Heikura, Seppo; Kaakkurivaara, Eeva; Dardykina, Anastasiia; de Chardin, Alice Teilhard

Andreja, Andreja; Kljajić Borštnar, Mirjana; Blatnik, Staša; Marolt, Marjeta; Bons, Roger W. H.; Smit, Koen; Glowatz, Matthias

Bled eConference

PublisherUniversity of Maribor Press

2025

Bled eConference

38th Bled eConference: Empowering Transformation: Shaping Digital Futures for All: Conference Proceedings

643

660

978-961-286-998-4

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.40

https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.40

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/492329617



In this paper, we build on a simplified process to evaluate AI systems compliance with AI Act. As AI Act’s risk-based regulatory measures simultaneously strive for providing innovative, but trustworthy AI systems to the market, we extend the process to an AI Regulatory Sandbox Framework (AIRSF), which is connected with the EU’s innovation ecosystem. The study builds on a design science approach combined with action research sandbox as a boundary object for multistakeholder sandbox development. We first analyse the options for regulating AI Systems.  In doing so, we explore the regulatory sandbox as a means aiming to remedy the known limitations of regulatory sandboxes, especially from the viewpoint for SMEs . We conclude by reflecting upon the findings during the sandbox development process.


Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:48