A4 Refereed article in a conference publication
From Simple Sandbox Process to Regulatory Sandbox Framework : Serving the Dual Objectives of AI Regulation
Authors: Heikkilä, Jukka; Lagstedt, Altti; Heikura, Seppo; Kaakkurivaara, Eeva; Dardykina, Anastasiia; de Chardin, Alice Teilhard
Editors: Andreja, Andreja; Kljajić Borštnar, Mirjana; Blatnik, Staša; Marolt, Marjeta; Bons, Roger W. H.; Smit, Koen; Glowatz, Matthias
Conference name: Bled eConference
Publisher: University of Maribor Press
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Bled eConference
Book title : 38th Bled eConference: Empowering Transformation: Shaping Digital Futures for All: Conference Proceedings
First page : 643
Last page: 660
eISBN: 978-961-286-998-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.40
Web address : https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.40
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/492329617
In this paper, we build on a simplified process to evaluate AI systems compliance with AI Act. As AI Act’s risk-based regulatory measures simultaneously strive for providing innovative, but trustworthy AI systems to the market, we extend the process to an AI Regulatory Sandbox Framework (AIRSF), which is connected with the EU’s innovation ecosystem. The study builds on a design science approach combined with action research sandbox as a boundary object for multistakeholder sandbox development. We first analyse the options for regulating AI Systems. In doing so, we explore the regulatory sandbox as a means aiming to remedy the known limitations of regulatory sandboxes, especially from the viewpoint for SMEs . We conclude by reflecting upon the findings during the sandbox development process.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |