A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Socioeconomic Differences in Vaccination Coverage After a Mandatory Vaccination Law, 1855-1900
Authors: Ukonaho, Susanna; Lummaa, Virpi; Briga, Michael
Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
Publishing place: CHICAGO
Publication year: 2025
Journal: JAMA Network Open
Journal name in source: JAMA Network Open
Journal acronym: JAMA NETW OPEN
Article number: e2460558
Volume: 8
Issue: 2
Number of pages: 11
ISSN: 2574-3805
eISSN: 2574-3805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60558
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60558
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/485150823
Importance
Mandatory vaccination is a major tool to combat increasing vaccine hesitancy. In principle, a vaccination law, ie, a mandatory vaccination law without exemptions, applies equally to everyone, but its effects across different socioeconomic groups (SEGs) remain unknown.
Objective
To examine the association of a vaccination law with vaccination coverage in different SEGs during 1855 to 1900.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This population-based cohort study monitored 45 years (1855-1900) of Finland's first vaccination campaign against smallpox to estimate the association of the 1883 vaccination law with vaccination coverage in infants (age <1 year) across different SEGs. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to January 2024.
Exposure
A mandatory smallpox vaccination law for all children.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Vaccination status was determined from vaccination records and defined as receiving 1 dose of the smallpox vaccine. The primary outcome was the annual vaccination coverage in different SEGs and its change before vs after the vaccination law.
Results
A total of 40 008 children aged less than 1 year were included. The high SEG had high vaccination coverage, at a mean (SD) of 90% (49 percentage points), and the law was associated with halting its declining trend. For the middle SEG, the law was associated with a 26-percentage point increase in coverage, to a mean (SD) of 83% (50 percentage points). For the low SEG, the law had no association with vaccination coverage, which always remained below 35% (mean [SD]: prelaw, 26% [22 percentage points]; postlaw, 32% [23 percentage points]).
Conclusions and Relevance
In this cohort study, a historic vaccination law was not associated with increased vaccination in the SEG with the lowest vaccination coverage, emphasizing the need for additional interventions to increase vaccine uptake in low-coverage communities.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
This work was funded by the University of Turku Graduate School; Turku University Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; the Ella & Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation; NordForsk (grant No. 104910); the Turku Collegium for Science, Medicine & Technology; the European Research Council (KinSocieties grant No. 101098266 and ERC-2022-ADG); and the Research Council of Finland (NetResilience and Human Diversity grant No. 345183, 345185, and 364385).