A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Socioeconomic Differences in Vaccination Coverage After a Mandatory Vaccination Law, 1855-1900




TekijätUkonaho, Susanna; Lummaa, Virpi; Briga, Michael

KustantajaAmerican Medical Association (AMA)

KustannuspaikkaCHICAGO

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalJAMA Network Open

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJAMA Network Open

Lehden akronyymiJAMA NETW OPEN

Artikkelin numeroe2460558

Vuosikerta8

Numero2

Sivujen määrä11

ISSN2574-3805

eISSN2574-3805

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60558

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60558

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/485150823


Tiivistelmä

Importance

Mandatory vaccination is a major tool to combat increasing vaccine hesitancy. In principle, a vaccination law, ie, a mandatory vaccination law without exemptions, applies equally to everyone, but its effects across different socioeconomic groups (SEGs) remain unknown.

Objective

To examine the association of a vaccination law with vaccination coverage in different SEGs during 1855 to 1900.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study monitored 45 years (1855-1900) of Finland's first vaccination campaign against smallpox to estimate the association of the 1883 vaccination law with vaccination coverage in infants (age <1 year) across different SEGs. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to January 2024.

Exposure

A mandatory smallpox vaccination law for all children.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Vaccination status was determined from vaccination records and defined as receiving 1 dose of the smallpox vaccine. The primary outcome was the annual vaccination coverage in different SEGs and its change before vs after the vaccination law.

Results

A total of 40 008 children aged less than 1 year were included. The high SEG had high vaccination coverage, at a mean (SD) of 90% (49 percentage points), and the law was associated with halting its declining trend. For the middle SEG, the law was associated with a 26-percentage point increase in coverage, to a mean (SD) of 83% (50 percentage points). For the low SEG, the law had no association with vaccination coverage, which always remained below 35% (mean [SD]: prelaw, 26% [22 percentage points]; postlaw, 32% [23 percentage points]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, a historic vaccination law was not associated with increased vaccination in the SEG with the lowest vaccination coverage, emphasizing the need for additional interventions to increase vaccine uptake in low-coverage communities.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This work was funded by the University of Turku Graduate School; Turku University Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; the Ella & Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation; NordForsk (grant No. 104910); the Turku Collegium for Science, Medicine & Technology; the European Research Council (KinSocieties grant No. 101098266 and ERC-2022-ADG); and the Research Council of Finland (NetResilience and Human Diversity grant No. 345183, 345185, and 364385).


Last updated on 2025-23-04 at 10:30