A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

The development of the Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale: A Delphi consensus and content validity study




TekijätSterkenburg, Annika; van Dongen, Lisa J. C.; Hafsteinsdottir, Thora B.

KustantajaElsevier BV

KustannuspaikkaPHILADELPHIA

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalJournal of Professional Nursing

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJournal of Professional Nursing

Lehden akronyymiJ PROF NURS

Vuosikerta57

Aloitussivu43

Lopetussivu52

Sivujen määrä10

ISSN8755-7223

eISSN1532-8481

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.002

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.002

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/485079262


Tiivistelmä

Background: PhD prepared nurses advance nursing science through research and integration of findings into practice. They demonstrate expertise in research, education, patient care, and policy. Various professional competencies are required for success in research, clinical practice, and education. Assessment of professional competencies is expected to stimulate competence and career development.

Aim: To reach consensus on professional competencies, develop an instrument to measure professional competencies of PhD prepared nurses and assess the content validity of the instrument.

Method: A Delphi consensus and content validity study was conducted using online questionnaires completed by international PhD prepared nurse researchers. The relevance of and agreement with the competencies were measures using Likert-scales and open-ended questions to determine consensus. The Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale was developed, and its content validity evaluated.

Results: Initially, four of 15 competencies were deemed 'very' or 'fairly' important by 18 PhD prepared nurses. In the second round with 13 adjusted competencies, eight competencies were rated 'very' or 'fairly' important. The content validity index scored 0.91.

Conclusion: Consensus was reached on most professional competencies, and the 13-item self-assessment instrument demonstrated excellent content validity. Further research is recommended to evaluate additional clinimetric properties before use of the instrument.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


Last updated on 2025-19-03 at 13:39