A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The development of the Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale: A Delphi consensus and content validity study




AuthorsSterkenburg, Annika; van Dongen, Lisa J. C.; Hafsteinsdottir, Thora B.

PublisherElsevier BV

Publishing placePHILADELPHIA

Publication year2025

JournalJournal of Professional Nursing

Journal name in sourceJournal of Professional Nursing

Journal acronymJ PROF NURS

Volume57

First page 43

Last page52

Number of pages10

ISSN8755-7223

eISSN1532-8481

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.002

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.002

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/485079262


Abstract

Background: PhD prepared nurses advance nursing science through research and integration of findings into practice. They demonstrate expertise in research, education, patient care, and policy. Various professional competencies are required for success in research, clinical practice, and education. Assessment of professional competencies is expected to stimulate competence and career development.

Aim: To reach consensus on professional competencies, develop an instrument to measure professional competencies of PhD prepared nurses and assess the content validity of the instrument.

Method: A Delphi consensus and content validity study was conducted using online questionnaires completed by international PhD prepared nurse researchers. The relevance of and agreement with the competencies were measures using Likert-scales and open-ended questions to determine consensus. The Postdoctoral Nurses Competence Scale was developed, and its content validity evaluated.

Results: Initially, four of 15 competencies were deemed 'very' or 'fairly' important by 18 PhD prepared nurses. In the second round with 13 adjusted competencies, eight competencies were rated 'very' or 'fairly' important. The content validity index scored 0.91.

Conclusion: Consensus was reached on most professional competencies, and the 13-item self-assessment instrument demonstrated excellent content validity. Further research is recommended to evaluate additional clinimetric properties before use of the instrument.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


Last updated on 2025-19-03 at 13:39