A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers




TekijätFrench, Jonathan M. R.; Deere, Kevin; Whitehouse, Michael R.; Pegg, Derek J.; Ciminello, Enrico; Valentini, Riccardo; Torre, Marina; Makela, Keijo; Lubbeke, Anne; Bohm, Eric R.; Fenstad, Anne Marie; Furnes, Ove; Hallan, Geir; Willis, Jinny; Overgaard, Soren; Rolfson, Ola; Sayers, Adrian

KustannuspaikkaUppsala

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalActa Orthopaedica

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiACTA ORTHOPAEDICA

Lehden akronyymiACTA ORTHOP

Vuosikerta95

Aloitussivu654

Lopetussivu660

Sivujen määrä7

ISSN1745-3674

eISSN1745-3682

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303

Verkko-osoitehttps://actaorthop.org/actao/article/view/42303

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/477402389


Tiivistelmä
Abstract

Background and purpose: National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.

Methods: We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.

Results: 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.

Conclusion: National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
JMF is a clinical research fellow funded by Orthopaedic Research UK and the British Hip Society.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:34