A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers
Authors: French, Jonathan M. R.; Deere, Kevin; Whitehouse, Michael R.; Pegg, Derek J.; Ciminello, Enrico; Valentini, Riccardo; Torre, Marina; Makela, Keijo; Lubbeke, Anne; Bohm, Eric R.; Fenstad, Anne Marie; Furnes, Ove; Hallan, Geir; Willis, Jinny; Overgaard, Soren; Rolfson, Ola; Sayers, Adrian
Publishing place: Uppsala
Publication year: 2024
Journal: Acta Orthopaedica
Journal name in source: ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA
Journal acronym: ACTA ORTHOP
Volume: 95
First page : 654
Last page: 660
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 1745-3674
eISSN: 1745-3682
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303
Web address : https://actaorthop.org/actao/article/view/42303
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/477402389
Abstract
Background and purpose: National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.
Methods: We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.
Results: 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.
Conclusion: National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
JMF is a clinical research fellow funded by Orthopaedic Research UK and the British Hip Society.