A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers




AuthorsFrench, Jonathan M. R.; Deere, Kevin; Whitehouse, Michael R.; Pegg, Derek J.; Ciminello, Enrico; Valentini, Riccardo; Torre, Marina; Makela, Keijo; Lubbeke, Anne; Bohm, Eric R.; Fenstad, Anne Marie; Furnes, Ove; Hallan, Geir; Willis, Jinny; Overgaard, Soren; Rolfson, Ola; Sayers, Adrian

Publishing placeUppsala

Publication year2024

JournalActa Orthopaedica

Journal name in sourceACTA ORTHOPAEDICA

Journal acronymACTA ORTHOP

Volume95

First page 654

Last page660

Number of pages7

ISSN1745-3674

eISSN1745-3682

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303

Web address https://actaorthop.org/actao/article/view/42303

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/477402389


Abstract
Abstract

Background and purpose: National joint replacement registries were developed for prospective monitoring of outcomes and post-market surveillance of implants. Increasingly registry data informs practice. However, analysis of a registry can only be as good as the data it captures on the population of interest. We aimed to analyze completeness of reporting of hip and knee replacement procedures for all national registries worldwide.

Methods: We analyzed annual reports and data provided following written requests to all active national hip and knee replacement registries. Coverage was defined as the proportion of hospitals in the country that participate in the registry. Procedure completeness was defined as the proportion of procedures successfully captured by the registry.

Results: 14 national registries were included, spanning years 2004 to 2022. Coverage was complete in 10. Median procedure completeness for primary hip and knee replacement across all years was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-97.7%). Median procedure completeness for revisions was 88.5% (IQR 81.0-92.5%). The terminology used and method of calculation of completeness estimates in the registries were variable.

Conclusion: National hip and knee replacement registry data generally reflects excellent coverage (full in 10 of 14 registries) and completeness (primary procedures 96.5% and revisions 88.5%) over the last 2 decades.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
JMF is a clinical research fellow funded by Orthopaedic Research UK and the British Hip Society.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:34