A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects




TekijätStålnacke, Sanna; Liira, Helena; Vangelova-Korpinen, Velina; Virrantaus, Hélène; Kanerva, Mari; Kvarnström, Kirsi; Sainio, Markku; Malmivaara, Antti; Vuokko, Aki; Varonen, Mikko; Venäläinen, Mikko; Arokoski, Jari

KustantajaTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

KustannuspaikkaABINGDON

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiSCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

Lehden akronyymiSCAND J PRIM HEALTH

Sivujen määrä9

ISSN0281-3432

eISSN1502-7724

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/458605625


Tiivistelmä

Background: After COVID-19 infection, long-term impacts on functioning may occur. We studied the functioning of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compared them to controls without PCC.

Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of 442 patients with PCC referred to rehabilitation at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Outpatient Clinic for the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and 198 controls without PCC. Functioning was assessed with a questionnaire including WHODAS 2.0. Patients underwent physical testing including a hand grip strength test (HGST) and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Lifestyle was assessed by questionnaire and comorbidities were collected as ICD-10 codes from the HUS Data Lake on the HUS Acamedic platform.

Results: The WHODAS 2.0 average total score was 34 (SD 18) (moderate functional limitation) for patients with PCC and 6 (SD 8) (normal or mild limitation) for the controls. The disability was higher in all aspects of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with PCC. Bivariate binomial and multivariable regression analyses showed that the presence of comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking predicted a WHODAS 2.0 score of 24 (moderate functional limitation) or above in the PCC group. The average 6MWT distance was 435 m (SD 98 m) in patients with PCC and 627 m (SD 70 m) in controls. HGST measurements showed no significant differences from controls.

Conclusions: In conclusion, patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning based on WHODAS 2.0 scores and the 6MWT results. Comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking were associated with moderate or severe limitations in functioning. Findings support that PCC is multifactorial and requires a holistic approach to rehabilitation.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101057553.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:40