A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects
Authors: Stålnacke, Sanna; Liira, Helena; Vangelova-Korpinen, Velina; Virrantaus, Hélène; Kanerva, Mari; Kvarnström, Kirsi; Sainio, Markku; Malmivaara, Antti; Vuokko, Aki; Varonen, Mikko; Venäläinen, Mikko; Arokoski, Jari
Publisher: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Publishing place: ABINGDON
Publication year: 2024
Journal: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Journal name in source: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Journal acronym: SCAND J PRIM HEALTH
Number of pages: 9
ISSN: 0281-3432
eISSN: 1502-7724
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/458605625
Background: After COVID-19 infection, long-term impacts on functioning may occur. We studied the functioning of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compared them to controls without PCC.
Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of 442 patients with PCC referred to rehabilitation at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Outpatient Clinic for the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and 198 controls without PCC. Functioning was assessed with a questionnaire including WHODAS 2.0. Patients underwent physical testing including a hand grip strength test (HGST) and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Lifestyle was assessed by questionnaire and comorbidities were collected as ICD-10 codes from the HUS Data Lake on the HUS Acamedic platform.
Results: The WHODAS 2.0 average total score was 34 (SD 18) (moderate functional limitation) for patients with PCC and 6 (SD 8) (normal or mild limitation) for the controls. The disability was higher in all aspects of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with PCC. Bivariate binomial and multivariable regression analyses showed that the presence of comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking predicted a WHODAS 2.0 score of 24 (moderate functional limitation) or above in the PCC group. The average 6MWT distance was 435 m (SD 98 m) in patients with PCC and 627 m (SD 70 m) in controls. HGST measurements showed no significant differences from controls.
Conclusions: In conclusion, patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning based on WHODAS 2.0 scores and the 6MWT results. Comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking were associated with moderate or severe limitations in functioning. Findings support that PCC is multifactorial and requires a holistic approach to rehabilitation.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101057553.