A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Are main clauses really ‘main’ clauses? The case of relative clauses in spoken Estonian and Finnish




TekijätLaury, Ritva; Pajusalu, Renate; Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa

KustantajaUNIV TARTU PRESS

KustannuspaikkaTARTU

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalEesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiEESTI JA SOOME-UGRI KEELETEADUSE AJAKIRI-JOURNAL OF ESTONIAN AND FINNO-UGRIC LINGUISTICS

Lehden akronyymiEESTI SOOME-UGRI KEE

Vuosikerta15

Numero1

Aloitussivu101

Lopetussivu126

Sivujen määrä26

ISSN1736-8987

eISSN2228-1339

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2024.15.1.03

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2024.15.1.03

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457444656


Tiivistelmä
The article concerns relative clause constructions and their main clauses in Estonian and Finnish conversation. The study shows that copula clauses and existential clauses predominate in the corpus data: these two clause types accounted for more than half of the main clauses. Such main clauses serve simply to introduce a referent which is then predicated upon in the relative clause and is likely to be subsequently discussed in the conversation. In addition, relative clauses are also used without any main clauses, headed with just a nominal, a free NP. The article thus shows that the main clauses of relative clauses in Estonian and Finnish conversation tend to be syntactically light. They are also pragmatically light, since it is the relative clause, and not the main clause, which contains the main information in the clause combination. This raises a question about the subordinate status of the relative clause.

Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:20