A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Are main clauses really ‘main’ clauses? The case of relative clauses in spoken Estonian and Finnish
Authors: Laury, Ritva; Pajusalu, Renate; Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
Publisher: UNIV TARTU PRESS
Publishing place: TARTU
Publication year: 2024
Journal: Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri
Journal name in source: EESTI JA SOOME-UGRI KEELETEADUSE AJAKIRI-JOURNAL OF ESTONIAN AND FINNO-UGRIC LINGUISTICS
Journal acronym: EESTI SOOME-UGRI KEE
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
First page : 101
Last page: 126
Number of pages: 26
ISSN: 1736-8987
eISSN: 2228-1339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2024.15.1.03(external)
Web address : https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2024.15.1.03(external)
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457444656(external)
The article concerns relative clause constructions and their main clauses in Estonian and Finnish conversation. The study shows that copula clauses and existential clauses predominate in the corpus data: these two clause types accounted for more than half of the main clauses. Such main clauses serve simply to introduce a referent which is then predicated upon in the relative clause and is likely to be subsequently discussed in the conversation. In addition, relative clauses are also used without any main clauses, headed with just a nominal, a free NP. The article thus shows that the main clauses of relative clauses in Estonian and Finnish conversation tend to be syntactically light. They are also pragmatically light, since it is the relative clause, and not the main clause, which contains the main information in the clause combination. This raises a question about the subordinate status of the relative clause.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
