A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Arithmetic fluency and number processing skills in identifying students with mathematical learning disabilities
Tekijät: Hellstrand, Heidi; Holopainen, Santeri; Korhonen, Johan; Räsänen, Pekka; Hakkarainen, Airi; Laakso, Mikko-Jussi; Laine, Anu; Aunio, Pirjo
Kustantaja: Elsevier
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: Research in Developmental Disabilities
Artikkelin numero: 104795
Vuosikerta: 151
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104795
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104795
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/456990848
Background
Students with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) struggle with number processing skills (e.g., enumeration and number comparison) and arithmetic fluency. Traditionally, MLD is identified based on arithmetic fluency. However, number processing skills are suggested to differentiate low achievement (LA) from MLD.
Aims
This study investigated the accuracy of number processing skills in identifying students with MLD and LA, based on arithmetic fluency, and whether the classification ability of number processing skills varied as a function of grade level.
Methods and procedures
The participants were 18,405 students (girls = 9080) from Grades 3–9 (ages 9–15). Students’ basic numerical skills were assessed with an online dyscalculia screener (Functional Numeracy Assessment –Dyscalculia Battery, FUNA-DB), which included number processing and arithmetic fluency as two factors.
Outcomes and results
Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor structure of FUNA-DB. The two-factor structure was invariant across language groups, gender, and grade levels. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses indicated that number processing skills are a fair classifier of MLD and LA status across grade levels. The classification accuracy of number processing skills was better when predicting MLD (cut-off < 5 %) compared to LA (cut-off < 25 %).
Conclusions and implications
Results highlight the need to measure both number processing and arithmetic fluency when identifying students with MLD.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (140884); the Academy of Finland EDUCA Flagship Programme (358947)