A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Arithmetic fluency and number processing skills in identifying students with mathematical learning disabilities




AuthorsHellstrand, Heidi; Holopainen, Santeri; Korhonen, Johan; Räsänen, Pekka; Hakkarainen, Airi; Laakso, Mikko-Jussi; Laine, Anu; Aunio, Pirjo

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2024

JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities

Article number104795

Volume151

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104795

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104795

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/456990848


Abstract


Background

Students with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) struggle with number processing skills (e.g., enumeration and number comparison) and arithmetic fluency. Traditionally, MLD is identified based on arithmetic fluency. However, number processing skills are suggested to differentiate low achievement (LA) from MLD.

Aims

This study investigated the accuracy of number processing skills in identifying students with MLD and LA, based on arithmetic fluency, and whether the classification ability of number processing skills varied as a function of grade level.

Methods and procedures

The participants were 18,405 students (girls = 9080) from Grades 3–9 (ages 9–15). Students’ basic numerical skills were assessed with an online dyscalculia screener (Functional Numeracy Assessment –Dyscalculia Battery, FUNA-DB), which included number processing and arithmetic fluency as two factors.

Outcomes and results

Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor structure of FUNA-DB. The two-factor structure was invariant across language groups, gender, and grade levels. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses indicated that number processing skills are a fair classifier of MLD and LA status across grade levels. The classification accuracy of number processing skills was better when predicting MLD (cut-off < 5 %) compared to LA (cut-off < 25 %).

Conclusions and implications

Results highlight the need to measure both number processing and arithmetic fluency when identifying students with MLD.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (140884); the Academy of Finland EDUCA Flagship Programme (358947)


Last updated on 2025-11-03 at 07:45