Psychometric properties of neck disability index – a systematic review and meta-analysis




Saltychev Mikhail, Pylkäs Kristian, Karklins Aleksandra, Juhola Juhani

PublisherTaylor & Francis

2024

Disability and Rehabilitation

Disability and Rehabilitation

46

23

5415

5431

0963-8288

1464-5165

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644

https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/381182766



Purpose: To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Materials and methods: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.

Results: Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.

Conclusions: The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).


Last updated on 2025-25-03 at 13:43