A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Psychometric properties of neck disability index – a systematic review and meta-analysis




TekijätSaltychev Mikhail, Pylkäs Kristian, Karklins Aleksandra, Juhola Juhani

KustantajaTaylor & Francis

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalDisability and Rehabilitation

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiDisability and Rehabilitation

Vuosikerta46

Numero23

Aloitussivu5415

Lopetussivu5431

ISSN0963-8288

eISSN1464-5165

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644

Verkko-osoite https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/381182766


Tiivistelmä

Purpose: To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Materials and methods: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.

Results: Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.

Conclusions: The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-25-03 at 13:43