A4 Refereed article in a conference publication

A comparison of AUC estimators in small-sample studies




AuthorsAirola A, Pahikkala T, Waegeman W, De Baets B, Salakoski T

EditorsDzeroski Saso, Geurts Pierre, Rousu Juho

Publication year2010

JournalJMLR workshop and conference proceedings

Book title Proceedings of the third International Workshop on Machine Learning in Systems Biology

Journal name in sourcePROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

Journal acronymJMLR WORKSH CONF PRO

Series titleProceedings of Machine Learning Research

Volume8

First page 3

Last page13

Number of pages11

ISSN1938-7288

Web address http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/proceedings/papers/v8/airola10a/airola10a.pdf


Abstract
Reliable estimation of the classification performance of learned predictive models is difficult, when working in the small sample setting. When dealing with biological data it is often the case that separate test data cannot be afforded. Cross-validation is in this case a typical strategy for estimating the performance. Recent results, further supported by experimental evidence presented in this article, show that many standard approaches to cross-validation suffer from extensive bias or variance when the area under ROC curve (AUC) is used as performance measure. We advocate the use of leave-pair-out cross-validation (LPOCV) for performance estimation, as it avoids many of these problems. A method previously proposed by us can be used to efficiently calculate this estimate for regularized least-squares (RLS) based learners.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:15