Consensus or dissensus? Analysing people's perceptions of the necessities of life in Finland




Mäkinen Lauri

PublisherPolicy Press

Bristol

2018

Journal of Poverty and Social Justice

26

3

359

377

19

1759-8273

1759-8281

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1332/175982718X15299593876369

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/jpsj/2018/00000026/00000003/art00004;jsessionid=457fpo4fre7d5.x-ic-live-01#

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/36334082



The aim of this study is to analyse whether or not people are in
consensus on what the necessities of life are in Finland. Consensus is
analysed through two criteria: a public oriented view on the necessities
and agreement between individuals. The study utilises a Finnish postal
survey
from 2015 where people were asked about the necessity of 23 items. The
results suggest that individual views are shaped by personal
circumstances and a fully public-oriented view cannot be established.
Further, the respondents did not seem to agree on what are necessities.
This implies that
the minimum living standard could not be established consensually.


Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:28