A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Consensus or dissensus? Analysing people's perceptions of the necessities of life in Finland




AuthorsMäkinen Lauri

PublisherPolicy Press

Publishing placeBristol

Publication year2018

JournalJournal of Poverty and Social Justice

Volume26

Issue3

First page 359

Last page377

Number of pages19

ISSN1759-8273

eISSN1759-8281

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1332/175982718X15299593876369

Web address https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/jpsj/2018/00000026/00000003/art00004;jsessionid=457fpo4fre7d5.x-ic-live-01#

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/36334082


Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse whether or not people are in
consensus on what the necessities of life are in Finland. Consensus is
analysed through two criteria: a public oriented view on the necessities
and agreement between individuals. The study utilises a Finnish postal
survey
from 2015 where people were asked about the necessity of 23 items. The
results suggest that individual views are shaped by personal
circumstances and a fully public-oriented view cannot be established.
Further, the respondents did not seem to agree on what are necessities.
This implies that
the minimum living standard could not be established consensually.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:28