PHR, We've Had a Problem Here




Minna M. Rantanen, Jani Koskinen

David Kreps, Charles Ess, Louise Leenen, Kai Kimppa

IFIP TC9 Human Choice and Computers Conference

2018

This Changes Everything – ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do?

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

537

537

374

383

978-3-319-99604-2

978-3-319-99605-9

1868-4238

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_28

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_28

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/36004816



Personal health records (PHRs) have been a global trend in recent decade. It has been seen as a concept and tool that could help patients maintaining health, improving their well-being, and supporting communication with healthcare professional etc. Despite the great amount of research about PHR there is no consensus what a PHR actually means in academic literature or other arenas. There are multiple terms in use and multiple de nitions which set challenges for rational discourse between citizens/patient, healthcare providers, system developers and policy makers. Especially, when citizens | as key stakeholder | should also be able to understand what those systems are we need clear and understandable de nition for PHR's. In the paper, we conduct a brief survey for dierent de nitions and show the problems that arise with the incoherent use of the term "PHR".


Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 21:37