A4 Refereed article in a conference publication

PHR, We've Had a Problem Here




AuthorsMinna M. Rantanen, Jani Koskinen

EditorsDavid Kreps, Charles Ess, Louise Leenen, Kai Kimppa

Conference nameIFIP TC9 Human Choice and Computers Conference

Publication year2018

Book title This Changes Everything – ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do?

Journal name in sourceIFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Series titleIFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Number in series537

Volume537

First page 374

Last page383

ISBN978-3-319-99604-2

eISBN978-3-319-99605-9

ISSN1868-4238

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_28

Web address https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99605-9_28

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/36004816


Abstract

Personal health records (PHRs) have been a global trend in recent decade. It has been seen as a concept and tool that could help patients maintaining health, improving their well-being, and supporting communication with healthcare professional etc. Despite the great amount of research about PHR there is no consensus what a PHR actually means in academic literature or other arenas. There are multiple terms in use and multiple de nitions which set challenges for rational discourse between citizens/patient, healthcare providers, system developers and policy makers. Especially, when citizens | as key stakeholder | should also be able to understand what those systems are we need clear and understandable de nition for PHR's. In the paper, we conduct a brief survey for dierent de nitions and show the problems that arise with the incoherent use of the term "PHR".


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 21:37