A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping: a response to Hämäläinen
Tekijät: Arvi Pakaslahti
Kustantaja: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Journal: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: SPORT ETHICS AND PHILOSOPHY
Lehden akronyymi: SPORT ETHICS PHILOS
Vuosikerta: 11
Numero: 2
Aloitussivu: 219
Lopetussivu: 223
Sivujen määrä: 5
ISSN: 1751-1321
eISSN: 1751-133X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2016.1272130
Verkko-osoite: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17511321.2016.1272130#aHR0cDovL3d3dy50YW5kZm9ubGluZS5jb20vZG9pL3BkZi8xMC4xMDgwLzE3NTExMzIxLjIwMTYuMTI3MjEzMD9uZWVkQWNjZXNzPXRydWVAQEAw
Tiivistelmä
In this paper, I criticize Mika Hamalainen's recent argument for compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping. I argue that Hamalainen's argument is problematic at least in four different ways. Two of my criticisms are intended to show that Hamalainen ignores some important considerations which he should have discussed. On the other hand, I also argue that Hamalainen's argument is inherently flawed in two respects.
In this paper, I criticize Mika Hamalainen's recent argument for compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping. I argue that Hamalainen's argument is problematic at least in four different ways. Two of my criticisms are intended to show that Hamalainen ignores some important considerations which he should have discussed. On the other hand, I also argue that Hamalainen's argument is inherently flawed in two respects.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali