A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping: a response to Hämäläinen
Authors: Arvi Pakaslahti
Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Publication year: 2017
Journal: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
Journal name in source: SPORT ETHICS AND PHILOSOPHY
Journal acronym: SPORT ETHICS PHILOS
Volume: 11
Issue: 2
First page : 219
Last page: 223
Number of pages: 5
ISSN: 1751-1321
eISSN: 1751-133X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2016.1272130
Web address : http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17511321.2016.1272130#aHR0cDovL3d3dy50YW5kZm9ubGluZS5jb20vZG9pL3BkZi8xMC4xMDgwLzE3NTExMzIxLjIwMTYuMTI3MjEzMD9uZWVkQWNjZXNzPXRydWVAQEAw
Abstract
In this paper, I criticize Mika Hamalainen's recent argument for compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping. I argue that Hamalainen's argument is problematic at least in four different ways. Two of my criticisms are intended to show that Hamalainen ignores some important considerations which he should have discussed. On the other hand, I also argue that Hamalainen's argument is inherently flawed in two respects.
In this paper, I criticize Mika Hamalainen's recent argument for compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping. I argue that Hamalainen's argument is problematic at least in four different ways. Two of my criticisms are intended to show that Hamalainen ignores some important considerations which he should have discussed. On the other hand, I also argue that Hamalainen's argument is inherently flawed in two respects.