Refereed journal article or data article (A1)

Leibniz and Spinozist Necessitarianism




List of Authors: Maunu Ari

Publisher: Franz Steiner Verlag

Place: Franz Steiner Verlag

Publication year: 2017

Journal: Studia Leibnitiana

Volume number: 48

Issue number: 2

Number of pages: 7

ISSN: 0039-3185

eISSN: 2366-228X

Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/19028158


Abstract

It is sometimes argued that Leibniz’s metaphysical commitments lead to Spinozist Necessitarianism, i.e., the view, in Spinoza’s words, that “Things could not have been produced by God in any way or in any order other than that in which they have been produced”. Leibniz comments on this passage as follows: “This proposition may be true or false, depending on how it is explained”. I suggest in this paper that what Leibniz means by this comment can be fleshed out by making a distinction between what could have been actual and what is possible. I also address some potential objections to this distinction and attempt to elaborate it by means of comparing Leibniz’s and Alvin Plantinga’s approaches to modality.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2022-07-04 at 16:25