A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Prognostic Significance of Tumor-associated Stroma in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study




TekijätAlmangush, Alhadi; Ruuskanen, Miia; Hagström, Jaana; Kosma, Veli-Matti; Nieminen, Pentti; Mäkitie, Antti A; Leivo, Ilmo

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiThe American journal of surgical pathology

Lehden akronyymiAm J Surg Pathol

Vuosikerta48

Numero1

Aloitussivu54

Lopetussivu58

ISSN0147-5185

eISSN1532-0979

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002137

Verkko-osoitehttps://journals.lww.com/ajsp/fulltext/2024/01000/prognostic_significance_of_tumor_associated_stroma.11.aspx

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/181774195


Tiivistelmä
Assessment of tumor-associated stroma has shown a reliable prognostic value in recent research. We evaluated the prognostic value of tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) in a large multicenter cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We used the conventional hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of 115 cases of NPC to assess TSR as described in recent guidelines. The amount of tumor-associated stroma was assessed as a percentage and then tumors were classified as stroma-high (>50%) or stroma-low (≤50%). Kaplan-Meier curves, χ2 test, and Cox regression univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out. A total of 48 (41.7%) tumors were stroma-high and 67 (58.3%) tumors were stroma-low. In the Cox regression multivariable analysis, the tumors categorized as stroma-high were associated with a worse overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.30 (95% CI: 1.27-4.15, P=0.006) and with poor disease-specific survival (hazard ratio=1.87, 95% CI: 1.07-3.28, P=0.029). The assessment of TSR in NPC is simple and cost-effective, and it has a significant prognostic value. TSR can aid in risk stratification and clinical decision-making in NPC.

Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 22:03