Recontacting biobank participants to collect lifestyle, behavioural and cognitive information via online questionnaires: lessons from a pilot study within FinnGen
: Rodosthenous Rodosthenis S, Niemi Mari EK, Kallio Lila, Perala Merja, Terho Perttu, Knopp Theresa, Punkka Eero, Makkonen Enni M, Nurmi Paula, Makela Johanna, Wihuri Pauli, Hautalahti Marco, Moffatt Corianna, Martini Paolo, Germine Laura, Makela Viola A, Karhunen Oona A, Lahti Jari, Hiekkalinna Tero S, Jyrhama Tero, Shen Huei-yi, Runz Heiko, Palotie Aarno, Perola Markus, Ganna Andrea; Group Author: FinnGen
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
: 2022
: BMJ Open
: BMJ OPEN
: BMJ OPEN
: e064695
: 12
: 10
: 10
: 2044-6055
: 2044-6055
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064695
: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/10/e064695
: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/176790913
Objectives
To recontact biobank participants and collect cognitive, behavioural and lifestyle information via a secure online platform.
Design
Biobank-based recontacting pilot study.
Setting
Three Finnish biobanks (Helsinki, Auria, Tampere) recruiting participants from February 2021 to July 2021.
Participants
All eligible invitees were enrolled in FinnGen by their biobanks (Helsinki, Auria, Tampere), had available genetic data and were >18 years old. Individuals with severe neuropsychiatric disease or cognitive or physical disabilities were excluded. Lastly, 5995 participants were selected based on their polygenic score for cognitive abilities and invited to the study. Among invitees, 1115 had successfully participated and completed the study questionnaire(s).
Outcome measures
The primary outcome was the participation rate among study invitees. Secondary outcomes included questionnaire completion rate, quality of data collected and comparison of participation rate boosting strategies.
Results
The overall participation rate was 18.6% among all invitees and 23.1% among individuals aged 18-69. A second reminder letter yielded an additional 9.7% participation rate in those who did not respond to the first invitation. Recontacting participants via an online healthcare portal yielded lower participation than recontacting via physical letter. The completion rate of the questionnaire and cognitive tests was high (92% and 85%, respectively), and measurements were overall reliable among participants. For example, the correlation (r) between self-reported body mass index and that collected by the biobanks was 0.92.
Conclusion
In summary, this pilot suggests that recontacting FinnGen participants with the goal to collect a wide range of cognitive, behavioural and lifestyle information without additional engagement results in a low participation rate, but with reliable data. We suggest that such information be collected at enrolment, if possible, rather than via post hoc recontacting.