A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Recontacting biobank participants to collect lifestyle, behavioural and cognitive information via online questionnaires: lessons from a pilot study within FinnGen




TekijätRodosthenous Rodosthenis S, Niemi Mari EK, Kallio Lila, Perala Merja, Terho Perttu, Knopp Theresa, Punkka Eero, Makkonen Enni M, Nurmi Paula, Makela Johanna, Wihuri Pauli, Hautalahti Marco, Moffatt Corianna, Martini Paolo, Germine Laura, Makela Viola A, Karhunen Oona A, Lahti Jari, Hiekkalinna Tero S, Jyrhama Tero, Shen Huei-yi, Runz Heiko, Palotie Aarno, Perola Markus, Ganna Andrea; Group Author: FinnGen

KustantajaBMJ Publishing Group

Julkaisuvuosi2022

JournalBMJ Open

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiBMJ OPEN

Lehden akronyymiBMJ OPEN

Artikkelin numero e064695

Vuosikerta12

Numero10

Sivujen määrä10

ISSN2044-6055

eISSN2044-6055

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064695

Verkko-osoitehttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/10/e064695

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/176790913


Tiivistelmä

Objectives

To recontact biobank participants and collect cognitive, behavioural and lifestyle information via a secure online platform.

Design

Biobank-based recontacting pilot study.

Setting

Three Finnish biobanks (Helsinki, Auria, Tampere) recruiting participants from February 2021 to July 2021.

Participants

All eligible invitees were enrolled in FinnGen by their biobanks (Helsinki, Auria, Tampere), had available genetic data and were >18 years old. Individuals with severe neuropsychiatric disease or cognitive or physical disabilities were excluded. Lastly, 5995 participants were selected based on their polygenic score for cognitive abilities and invited to the study. Among invitees, 1115 had successfully participated and completed the study questionnaire(s).

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was the participation rate among study invitees. Secondary outcomes included questionnaire completion rate, quality of data collected and comparison of participation rate boosting strategies.

Results

The overall participation rate was 18.6% among all invitees and 23.1% among individuals aged 18-69. A second reminder letter yielded an additional 9.7% participation rate in those who did not respond to the first invitation. Recontacting participants via an online healthcare portal yielded lower participation than recontacting via physical letter. The completion rate of the questionnaire and cognitive tests was high (92% and 85%, respectively), and measurements were overall reliable among participants. For example, the correlation (r) between self-reported body mass index and that collected by the biobanks was 0.92.

Conclusion

In summary, this pilot suggests that recontacting FinnGen participants with the goal to collect a wide range of cognitive, behavioural and lifestyle information without additional engagement results in a low participation rate, but with reliable data. We suggest that such information be collected at enrolment, if possible, rather than via post hoc recontacting.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:19