A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Whole blood based point-of-care assay for the detection of anti-pertussis toxin IgG antibodies




AuthorsKnuutila Aapo, Rautanen Carita, Barkoff Alex-Mikael, Mertsola Jussi, He Qiushui

PublisherELSEVIER

Publication year2022

JournalJournal of Immunological Methods

Journal name in sourceJOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS

Journal acronymJ IMMUNOL METHODS

Article number 113361

Volume510

Number of pages4

ISSN0022-1759

eISSN1872-7905

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2022.113361(external)

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2022.113361(external)

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/176744795(external)


Abstract
Current serological diagnosis of pertussis is usually done by ELISA to determine serum specific anti-pertussis toxin (PT) IgG antibodies. However, the ELISAs are often central-laboratory based, require trained staff, and have long turnaround times. A rapid point-of-care (POC) assay for pertussis serology would aid in both diagnosis and surveillance of the disease. In this study, a quantitative lateral flow assay (LFA) with fluorescent Eu-nanoparticle reporters was used for the detection of anti-PT antibodies from whole blood. The assay was eval-uated by testing overall 141 samples including 25 before and 116 one month after acellular pertussis booster vaccination. LFA results were compared to those obtained with standardized anti-PT IgG ELISAs with paired serum samples. Correlation between the assays was high (Pearson R = 0.832), and the achieved analytical sensitivity of the LFA was 29 IU/mL, which would be sufficient for clinically relevant cutoffs for determining recent infections. The paired samples, collected pre-and post-booster, demonstrated a significant increase in anti-PT IgG antibodies similar to that detected by ELISA. The developed LFA opens up several alternatives for a suitable POC test also in middle-and low-income countries.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:45