A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The effect of various simultaneous sources of mechanical error in the estimators of correlation causing defation in reliability: seeking the best options of correlation for defation‑corrected reliability




AuthorsMetsämuuronen Jari

PublisherBehaviormetric Society of Japan

Publication year2022

JournalBehaviormetrika

Volume43

Issue1

First page 91

Last page130

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-022-00158-y

Web address https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41237-022-00158-y

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175984687


Abstract

Estimates of reliability by traditional estimators are deflated, because the item-total or item-score correlation (Rit) or principal component or factor loading (λi) embedded in the estimators are seriously deflated. Different optional estimators of correlation that can replace Rit and λi are compared in this article. Simulations show that estimators such as polychoric correlation (RPC), gamma (G), dimension-corrected G (G2), and attenuation-corrected Rit (RAC) and eta (EAC) reflect the true correlation without any loss of information with several sources of technical or mechanical error in the estimators of correlation (MEC) including extreme item difficulty and item variance, small number of categories in the item and in the score, and the varying distributions of the latent variable. To obtain deflation-corrected reliability, RPCGG2RAC, and EAC are likely to be the best options closely followed by r-bireg or r-polyreg coefficient (RREG).


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 11:07