A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

Cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being and safety promotion: a systematic review




AuthorsHult Marja, Halminen Olli, Linna Miika, Suominen Sakari, Kangasniemi Mari

PublisherOxford University Press

Publication year2021

JournalEuropean Journal of Public Health

Journal name in sourceEuropean journal of public health

Volume31

Issue5

First page 997

Last page1003

ISSN1464-360X

eISSN1464-360X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab068

Web address https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab068

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/68461312


Abstract

Background
The health, well-being and safety of the general population are important goals for society, but forecasting outcomes and weighing up the costs and benefits of effective promotional programmes is challenging. This study aimed to identify and describe the cost-effectiveness calculators that analyze interventions that promote health, well-being and safety.
Methods
Our systematic review used the CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, EconLit, PubMed and Scopus databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English between January 2010 and April 2020. The data were analyzed with narrative synthesis.
Results
The searches identified 6880 papers and nine met our eligibility and quality criteria. All nine calculators focussed on interventions that promoted health and well-being, but no safety promotion tools were identified. Five calculators were targeted at group-level initiatives, two at regional levels and two at national levels. The calculators combined different data sources, in addition to data inputted by users. This included empirical research and previous literature. The calculators created baseline estimates and assessed the cost-effectiveness of the interventions before or after they were implemented. The calculators were heterogeneous in terms of outcomes, the interventions they evaluated and the data and methods used.
Conclusion
This review identified nine calculators that assessed the cost-effectiveness of health and well-being interventions and supported decision-making and resource allocations at local, regional and national levels, but none focussed on safety. Producing calculators that work accurately in different contexts might be challenging. Further research should identify how to assess sustainable evaluation of health, well-being and safety strategies.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 21:54