A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Use and impact of high intensity treatments in patients with traumatic brain injury across Europe: a CENTER-TBI analysis
Tekijät: Huijben Jilske A, Dixit Abhishek, Stocchetti Nino, Maas Andrew IR, Lingsma Hester F, van der Jagt Mathieu, Nelson David, Citerio Giuseppe, Wilson Lindsay, Menon David K, Ercole Ari; the CENTER-TBI investigators and participants
Kustantaja: BMC
Julkaisuvuosi: 2021
Journal: Critical Care
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: CRITICAL CARE
Lehden akronyymi: CRIT CARE
Artikkelin numero: ARTN 78
Vuosikerta: 25
Sivujen määrä: 13
ISSN: 1364-8535
eISSN: 1466-609X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03370-y
Verkko-osoite: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-03370-y
Purpose: To study variation in, and clinical impact of high Therapy Intensity Level (TIL) treatments for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) across European Intensive Care Units (ICUs).
Methods: We studied high TIL treatments (metabolic suppression, hypothermia (<35 degrees C), intensive hyperventilation (PaCO2 < 4 kPa), and secondary decompressive craniectomy) in patients receiving ICP monitoring in the ICU stratum of the CENTER-TBI study. A random effect logistic regression model was used to determine between-centre variation in their use. A propensity score-matched model was used to study the impact on outcome (6-months Glasgow Outcome Score-extended (GOSE)), whilst adjusting for case-mix severity, signs of brain herniation on imaging, and ICP.
Results: 313 of 758 patients from 52 European centres (41%) received at least one high TIL treatment with significant variation between centres (median odds ratio =2.26). Patients often transiently received high TIL therapies without escalation from lower tier treatments. 38% of patients with high TIL treatment had favourable outcomes (GOSE >= 5). The use of high TIL treatment was not significantly associated with worse outcome (285 matched pairs, OR 1.4, 95% CI [1.0-2.0]). However, a sensitivity analysis excluding high TIL treatments at day 1 or use of metabolic suppression at any day did reveal a statistically significant association with worse outcome.
Conclusion: Substantial between-centre variation in use of high TIL treatments for TBI was found and treatment escalation to higher TIL treatments were often not preceded by more conventional lower TIL treatments. The significant association between high TIL treatments after day 1 and worse outcomes may reflect aggressive use or unmeasured confounders or inappropriate escalation strategies.